Home›Reviews›Make (ex-Integromat)

Make (ex-Integromat) Review 2026

More powerful than Zapier, harder to learn

Make is what Zapier power users switch to when the bill gets too high. The learning curve is real but the capabilities and pricing make it worth it.

Best for Power Users✓ Tested May 2026Tested 50+ hours
OVERALL SCORE
81
Content Quality
84
Speed
82
Ease of Use
65
Value for Money
92
SEO Features
50
Starting at$9/mo
Core (10K ops/mo)
Affiliate: 20% recurring
Try Make (ex-Integromat) →

Affiliate link — we earn a commission

Pros & Cons

✓ PROS
✓10x cheaper than Zapier at comparable volume
✓Visual scenario builder is genuinely powerful
✓HTTP module enables any API — not limited to integrations
✓Error handling and branching logic far superior to Zapier
✗ CONS
✗Steeper learning curve — expect 3-5 hours before first success
✗Documentation less comprehensive than Zapier
✗Fewer pre-built templates

Who Should Use It?

✓ Great for
→ Technical users
→ High-volume automation
→ Complex multi-branch workflows
✗ Not ideal for
→ Non-technical teams needing quick setup

Real Output Sample

Actual output from our test session — same prompt across all tools so you can compare.

MAKE (EX-INTEGROMAT) · REAL OUTPUTCost comparison for 50,000 operations/month: • Zapier: $299/mo (Professional) • Make: $29/mo (Pro) • Savings: $270/mo = $3,240/year At that volume, Make pays for itself in week one.
Marcus Webb
Marcus Webb
Founder, WriteTested · 14 years in content · 500+ hours testing AI tools

I ran a 20-person content agency before GPT-4 changed the industry. I shut down half the team and started testing every AI writing tool obsessively. Every score on this site comes from real work — not toy prompts, not sponsored placements.